FinSuite · Integrations

PTAS FinSuite Integrations

FinSuite runs in front of your system of record and posts into it. Here is how the connection is made.

Blue and grey network cables plugged into numbered ports on a patch panel

What moves

What flows between FinSuite and your ledger

Masters and documents come in. Approved entries, attachments and status go out. FinSuite does the checking and the routing; the ERP stays the system of record.

Your ERP or accounting system

Vendor master, purchase orders, goods receipts, chart of accounts, payment status

DocPro

Invoices, credit notes and statements, read and scored per field

Your configuration

Entities, tax codes, tolerances, approval bands, field mapping

FinSuite

Entries posted, not keyed

One entry per approved invoice, coded and matched, with the invoice image attached.

Status back in the queue

Document numbers, payment dates and holds come back, so FinSuite knows what was paid without anyone looking it up.

A trail on both sides

The ledger document number sits on the FinSuite record, and the invoice image sits on the ledger document.

The systems on this page are planning examples, and none of them is a packaged connector. Which ledger each entity runs, which interfaces your IT team will release and who approves what are confirmed during assessment.

All integrations

Systems of record

The systems FinSuite posts into

Each has a page of its own. Where we have described the route in detail, the card says which methods apply; where the route depends on your edition and version, it says so.

SAP, Oracle and QuickBooks pages describe the route we would propose for each: OData or BAPIs on SAP, the REST APIs or FBDI file loads on Oracle, the Accounting API on QuickBooks Online and files on Desktop. For Microsoft Dynamics, Tally, Zoho and NetSuite, the route depends on the edition, version and hosting you run, so the method is confirmed in discovery once we have seen yours.

Showing a system's name here is not a claim of partnership, certification or a marketplace listing. The SAP, Oracle and QuickBooks pages say plainly that we hold none for those systems, and a name on a card should not suggest otherwise for the rest.

Integration methods

Four ways to connect, named per system

Which one fits depends less on the ERP than on your IT team, your support contract and how many ledgers the group runs.

Native

What the system ships itself

Several ERPs have their own invoice capture or approval features, and some customers use them. We install nothing inside your ERP and claim no packaged connector or marketplace listing. Where the system's own feature fits your process, we say so.

API

Our default where one exists

FinSuite reads masters and posts entries through the interfaces the system releases, signed in as one integration user authorised for those calls and nothing broader.

File

Scheduled import files

A file in the format the ledger already imports, loaded on a schedule, with the import report read back for rejections. Slower than an API, and often the easier route to get approved.

Custom

Several entities or systems

Several ledgers, an ERP migration part way through, or a procurement system in front of the ERP. Orchestration sits on top: one queue, one approval policy, one mapping per entity.

Illustrative example: one group, four systems, four routes

Entity and systemLikely methodWhy
Parent company · SAP S/4HANAAPIOData services released by basis
Indian subsidiary · TallyFileScheduled import, report read back
UK entity · QuickBooks OnlineAPIAuthorised by the QuickBooks admin
Group procurement · in-house systemCustomOrchestration across systems
One FinSuite queueFour routesOne mapping per entity
Confirmed in discovery Every method above is a starting assumption until your IT team has seen what each system will release.

Illustrative data. A group with several ledgers is one FinSuite rollout with a mapping per entity, rather than four separate projects.

What we would not automate. An entry does not post until the vendor exists in that entity, the match has passed your tolerances and someone with the right limit has approved it. Anything else waits for review, because reversing a posting takes more hands than deciding first. And if goods receipts are recorded weeks after delivery, a three-way match will fail with FinSuite in front of the ERP just as it does without. We say that at assessment.

Field mapping

Where each finance object lands

The mapping is agreed before build and kept per entity, in the terms your ERP team already uses. This is the starting point we bring to an assessment.

Finance objectIn your ledger
Vendor The vendor or supplier record in your ledger, matched on GSTIN or tax number and bank details before anything is proposed. A new vendor is created by whoever your process names as owner of the master: your master data team, or FinSuite Vendor Management after verification and approval.
Purchase order Read line by line for item, quantity, unit price and currency, so the match runs line by line. Orders raised outside the ERP are referenced on the posting.
Goods receipt Read for the quantity actually received, so the three-way match compares the invoice with what arrived. A service confirmation plays the same part for services.
Invoice or bill Posted against the purchase order where there is one, or coded to GL account and cost centre where there is not. Held or parked where your ERP runs the approval, posted where FinSuite does. The image is attached either way.
Tax The tax code on each line is validated against the document: GSTIN, HSN or SAC and place of supply in India, VAT registration elsewhere. A mismatch is held for review, never posted with a guessed code.
Payment status Read back on a schedule with any payment block, so an invoice held in the ERP shows as held in FinSuite and the supplier gets a straight answer.

The entry, on both sides · Illustrative example

FinSuiteValidated
VendorV-2041
Ledger5210
DimensionPlant 2
Net / tax₹ 2,29,000 / 41,220
Your ERPSystem of record
Creditor2041
GL account5210
Cost centrePLANT2
Document4500091827Posted
Linked both ways The ERP document carries a link back to the invoice image it came from.

Field mapping is yours to define. Entries are validated against it before they reach the ERP, not rejected by it afterwards.

Status written back

What comes back from the ledger

Posting is half the job. FinSuite reads back what the ERP did with each entry, so nobody has to log in to find out.

Illustrative example: what the ERP tells FinSuite afterwards

PostingWritten by FinSuite
Invoice MC-2026-04871ERP document 5105600412Posted
Invoice imageAttached to the ERP documentLinked
PaymentRead back on a schedule
Payment run, 13 SepCleared, clearing document 1500032217Paid
Invoice NG-26-00913Payment block set by treasuryHeld
RejectedKept with the ERP's message
Invoice TR-7781Posting period closed in the ERPTo a person

Illustrative data. An invoice held in the ERP shows as held in FinSuite, so the answer to a supplier's query sits in one place.

One place approves. If your finance team already approves inside the ERP, FinSuite hands over a complete document and the approval stays there. Otherwise FinSuite holds the invoice until the right person approves, then posts. Running both would mean two approvals that can disagree, and we would not set it up that way.

A posting the ERP refuses is kept with the message it gave and sent to a person. A closed period or a blocked vendor is a decision for your team, and a retry loop would only hide it.

Security of the connection

What protects the link to your ledger

Four controls, each one visible to your ERP and security teams. None of them depends on trusting us.

An integration user your team creates

FinSuite signs in as a system user authorised for the calls it makes and nothing broader. Credentials are stored encrypted and rotated on your schedule, and the user can be disabled in your ERP at any time.

A route your security team approves

An on-premise ledger stays behind your firewall, and traffic arrives by the route your security team signs off. FinSuite itself can run on-premise or air-gapped where supported.

Every call logged with its evidence

Each read and posting is recorded with the document it came from, who approved it and the document number the ledger returned.

Test system first

Where your ERP has a test or quality system, the mapping is built and checked there, and moves to production through your change control after your finance team has seen the postings.

Approval bands, segregation of duties and the limits on what FinSuite may write are set out on FinSuite Security.

FAQ

Questions ERP and finance systems teams ask

Do you have a native connector for our ERP?

Not one we would claim. FinSuite connects through the interfaces your system releases: an API where there is one, an import file where there is not, and custom orchestration where several systems are involved. The SAP, Oracle and QuickBooks pages describe those routes in detail. For other systems the method is confirmed in discovery against the version you run.

We run SAP at group level and Tally in India. Is that two integrations?

It is one FinSuite rollout with two routes and one mapping per entity. Each ledger keeps its own tax codes, accounts and tolerances. The queue is shared, with the entity as a dimension, so one team can work both.

Will invoices appear in our ERP before they are approved?

Only if you want them to. Where your team approves inside the ERP, FinSuite hands over a complete document and leaves the approval there. Otherwise FinSuite holds the invoice until the right person approves it, then posts. One place approves, never both.

What happens when the ERP rejects a posting?

The rejection is kept with the message the ERP returned and goes to a person. A closed period, a blocked vendor or a missing cost centre needs a decision from your team, so FinSuite does not keep retrying it.

How long does an integration take?

It is built inside the FinSuite rollout, which typically takes 4 to 12 weeks. That is an indicative range that varies with document types, workflows, integrations and deployment. A file route is usually quicker to get approved; an API route is quicker in daily running.

Next step

Tell us which ledgers the entries have to land in

The finance workflow assessment asks which system each entity runs and how invoices reach it today. The answers shape the integration before anyone writes a mapping.