Research · Benchmark

PTAS AI 2026 Automation Benchmark

How automation-ready is your business? A short assessment, an Automation Readiness Score out of 100, and what to do about it.

Laptop on a glass table showing an analytics dashboard with KPI figures and charts

PTAS AI 2026 Automation Benchmark

How automation-ready is your business?

Fourteen questions, about seven minutes, and an Automation Readiness Score out of 100 with the two places we would start.

PTAS AI methodology. Not an industry-standard benchmark. The dimensions, weights and bands are our own. They have not been scientifically validated, and the score does not compare you with other companies.

The benchmark asks how work moves through your operation today: how routine tasks get done, how documents enter your systems, how clean the master data is, how systems exchange data, how approvals run, where AI is already used and who can change a rule. Each answer is scored, the scores are weighted, and the total is your Automation Readiness Score.

We call it a benchmark because it holds every answer against the same fixed rubric, in the same order, every time. It is not a league table. There are no other companies behind your number, and this page publishes no results or statistics from the people who have taken it.

What it is good for is the first meeting. A score of 47 with Document Automation at the bottom is a more useful agenda than "where should we use AI?", and it is an agenda your finance, operations and IT leads can each check against what they see. You take it through the finance workflow assessment if payables is already the candidate, or book a call and work through it with the team.

Seven dimensions

Where the 100 points go

Two questions per dimension. The weights say where readiness is usually won or lost: in the process and its documents far more than in how much AI a team has used.

Automation Readiness Score · how the 100 points are split

DimensionPointsQuestions
Process Automation251 and 2
Document Automation203 and 4
Data Quality155 and 6
System Integration157 and 8
Workflow Maturity109 and 10
AI Adoption1011 and 12
Governance513 and 14
Automation Readiness Score10014 questions
PTAS AI methodology Not an industry-standard benchmark. The weights are our judgement of where projects hold or stall, set by hand and not fitted to outcome data.

Process and documents carry 45 of the 100 points. Governance carries five, and it can still stop a live project faster than any other dimension.

25 points

Process Automation

How much routine work still runs on manual steps, and whether a person, a script or a system picks up a task when it comes round.

20 points

Document Automation

How invoices, receipts and forms get into your systems, and how much of what is read is checked against a PO, master data or tax records.

15 points

Data Quality

Whether vendor, customer, item and account masters are clean and owned, and whether a reported number can be traced to its document.

15 points

System Integration

How the ERP, CRM, banking and document stores exchange data, and what it would take for a new tool to post into the ERP next month.

10 points

Workflow Maturity

Whether approval thresholds are written rules or habits, and whether you find out a case is stuck from an alert or a complaint.

10 points

AI Adoption

Where AI runs today, if anywhere, and what the team learned from automation projects it has already tried.

5 points

Governance

Who can change a rule that affects payments or compliance, how the change is recorded, and how access and retention are enforced.

Two tracks

Same weights, different questions

The finance track keeps the seven dimensions and asks about payables instead: invoice intake, matching, vendor data, posting, GST validation and payment limits.

The arithmetic

How fourteen answers become one number

Four steps, the same for every respondent and both tracks. Nothing is adjusted by industry or company size.

  1. 01

    Answer

    Each of the fourteen questions has four options, from the most manual to the most systemised. Pick the one closest to how work runs today.

    Typed in by hand → 0 · Extracted, low-confidence fields reviewed → 3

  2. 02

    Average

    The two answers in a dimension are averaged and divided by three, giving a share between nothing and all of that dimension.

    2 and 1 → 1.5 of 3 → half

  3. 03

    Weight

    The share is multiplied by the dimension weight and kept to one decimal place.

    Half of Process Automation → 12.5 of 25

  4. 04

    Add

    The seven results are added and rounded to a whole number. That number sets the band.

    46.7 → 47 → Developing

One result, worked through · Illustrative example

DimensionPointsAnswers
Process Automation12.5 of 252 and 1
Document Automation (second lowest)6.7 of 201 and 1
Data Quality10.0 of 152 and 2
System Integration7.5 of 151 and 2
Workflow Maturity5.0 of 102 and 1
AI Adoption (lowest)1.7 of 101 and 0
Governance3.3 of 52 and 2
Automation Readiness Score47 of 10046.7, rounded
Developing 47 falls in the 40 to 59 band. The result page points to AI Agents and the DocPro document test, because AI Adoption and Document Automation scored lowest.

Illustrative data. A team with no AI in production can lose ten points at most. A team that keys documents by hand and checks none of them loses all twenty for documents.

Result bands

Emerging, Developing, Automation Ready, Advanced

The band is a reading of the whole. The seven bars on the result page are where the useful detail is.

Under 40

Emerging

Most work is still manual and disconnected. The first project should be small, document-led and measurable.

40 to 59

Developing

Parts of the operation are ready and parts will fight you. Start where the data and the systems already cooperate.

60 to 79

Automation Ready

The foundations are in place. A focused workflow can go live without a clean-up project first.

80 to 100

Advanced

Automation runs inside governed workflows. The next gains come from widening coverage and tightening the feedback loop.

What comes back

Your two lowest dimensions pick the next step

The result shows the score, the band and a bar for each dimension, and the same result arrives by email with your answers attached. It then points to two pages, one for each of your two lowest dimensions.

If this dimension is among your lowestThe result points you to
Process Automation. Pick one process and make its steps explicit before automating any of them. Business Process Automation
Document Automation. See what extraction looks like on your own paperwork. Test a document with DocPro
Data Quality. Clean master data is the cheapest accuracy gain available. Start with vendors. Vendor Management Automation
System Integration. Decide how a result will reach your ERP before you decide what produces it. Integrations
Workflow Maturity. Write the approval thresholds down first. Workflow Automation
AI Adoption. Give one bounded task to one agent with a review gate, and measure it for a month. AI Agents
Governance. Decide who can change a rule before any rule starts making decisions. Human-in-the-Loop

Limits

What the benchmark is not

A score of 72 with a vendor master full of duplicates is still a vendor master full of duplicates. The benchmark tells you where to look.

Not a comparison

It does not rank you against other companies

The score compares your answers with a fixed rubric. There are no peer averages behind it and no industry percentile in the result.

Not validated

It has not been tested against outcomes

Nobody has checked statistically whether a higher score predicts a better project. The weights are a considered opinion, written down so it can be argued with.

Not a measurement

It does not know your numbers

Volumes, cycle times, error rates and the cost of the process come from your own queue, measured with your team. The score cannot estimate them and does not try.

The fourteen answers also cannot see your documents. Whether a creased receipt or a forty-line invoice can be read is a separate question, and the DocPro document test answers it on one of your own files. The readiness checklist goes through each dimension in more depth, with what to do about a low one before a project starts.

FAQ

Questions about the benchmark

Is the Automation Benchmark an industry standard?

No. It is PTAS AI methodology. The seven dimensions, the weights and the band thresholds are ours, set from what has decided the outcome of projects we have scoped. It has not been scientifically validated, and it does not compare you with other companies.

What is the difference between the benchmark and the assessment?

The benchmark is the method: what is measured, how it is weighted and what the bands mean. The assessment is where you take it. The general track covers the whole operation; the finance workflow assessment asks the same number of questions about accounts payable. Both use the same scorer.

How long does it take, and what do I need?

About seven minutes for fourteen questions. You need a rough idea of how work runs today, not figures. Name, work email and company are required so the result can be sent to you; everything else on the form is optional.

Do you publish benchmark results or industry averages?

No. This page publishes no aggregate results or statistics. If you tick the research box, your answers may be included in aggregated PTAS AI benchmark research, and any research we publish will state its sample and method. Leave the box clear and your answers are used for your result alone.

My score is low. Does that mean we should not automate?

No. A low score means the first project should be smaller and more document-led, and that some groundwork sits alongside it. The two lowest dimensions tell you what that groundwork is. A low score in a dimension is the first piece of work, not a reason to wait.

Why does governance carry only five points?

Because the weights reflect where readiness is usually decided before a project starts, and that is mostly in the process and its documents. Governance matters more once a project is live, where it is the dimension most likely to stop one. If it is among your two lowest, the result points you to human-in-the-loop design.

PTAS AI 2026 Automation Benchmark

Take the benchmark in seven minutes

Fourteen questions, an Automation Readiness Score out of 100, your band, and the two pages we would read first. The copy in your inbox has your answers attached.